NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 680 MHz
- 7.3x more texture fill rate: 39.72 GTexel / s vs 5.44 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 120
- 7.8x better floating-point performance: 1,271 gflops vs 163.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 13.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2593 vs 192
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3289 vs 1503
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3289 vs 1503
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 14 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz vs 680 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.72 GTexel / s vs 5.44 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 120 |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops vs 163.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2593 vs 192 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3289 vs 1503 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3289 vs 1503 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 329 vs 271
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 329 vs 271 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2593 | 192 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 271 | 329 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10220 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1973 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1973 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2188 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2188 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3289 | 1503 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3289 | 1503 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
Code name | GM107 | M76 |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 14 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 907 | 905 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz | 680 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | 163.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 120 |
Texture fill rate | 39.72 GTexel / s | 5.44 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 390 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-II |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 24 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
PowerPlay 7.0 |