NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 771 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 797 MHz
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 122 Watt
- 16.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1973 vs 117
- 20.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2188 vs 108.2
- 27.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3289 vs 119.7
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 8 November 2013 |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz vs 771 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1973 vs 117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2188 vs 108.2 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3289 vs 119.7 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 39.72 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
- Around 93% better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 1,271 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6912 vs 1973
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6710 vs 2188
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6703 vs 3289
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s vs 39.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops vs 1,271 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6912 vs 1973 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6710 vs 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6703 vs 3289 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2568 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 262 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10292 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1973 | 6912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1973 | 117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2188 | 6710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2188 | 108.2 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3289 | 6703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3289 | 119.7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.184 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1002.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.261 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.752 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 126.579 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 8 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 916 | 918 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 797 MHz |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz | 771 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 39.72 GTexel / s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 122 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |