NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M vs AMD Radeon HD 8310E
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M and AMD Radeon HD 8310E videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 7.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2585 vs 341
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 187
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 23 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2585 vs 341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 vs 187 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8310E
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8310E
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | AMD Radeon HD 8310E |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2585 | 341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 187 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9728 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.396 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 373.644 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.54 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.412 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4148 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4148 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | AMD Radeon HD 8310E | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Kalindi |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 23 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 884 | 887 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz | 400 MHz |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,178 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 32 or 80 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 or 2500 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI |