NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 25% higher core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 732 MHz
• Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 41.0 GTexel / s
• Around 43% higher pipelines: 640 vs 448
• Around 10% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 1,311.7 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 210 Watt
• 3.2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1280 MB
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.396 vs 34.324
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.158 vs 121.575
• Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2133
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3333
• Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2133
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3333

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

• Around 52% higher memory clock speed: 3800 MHz vs 1000 or 2500 MHz
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1181.463 vs 373.644
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.978 vs 2.54
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.37 vs 39.412
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4590 vs 4148
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4590 vs 4148
• Around 25% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4197 vs 3350

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.396 34.324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	373.644 1181.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.54 3.978
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.412 58.37
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	139.158 121.575
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4148 4590
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 2133
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4148 4590
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 2133
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 4197

Compare specifications (specs)