NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M and AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 24% higher core clock speed: 944 MHz vs 760 MHz
  • Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 844 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
  • Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • 6.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3775 vs 567
  • Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 340 vs 226
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 9 January 2015 vs 23 May 2013
Core clock speed 944 MHz vs 760 MHz
Boost clock speed 950 MHz vs 844 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 32 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3775 vs 567
PassMark - G2D Mark 340 vs 226

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3775
567
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
340
226
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark 3775 567
PassMark - G2D Mark 340 226
Geekbench - OpenCL 14739
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 67.59
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 720.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.903
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 57.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 223.296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5783
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5783
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3337
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1831

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell 2.0 TeraScale 3
Code name GM204 Scrapper
Launch date 9 January 2015 23 May 2013
Place in performance rating 703 705
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 950 MHz 844 MHz
Core clock speed 944 MHz 760 MHz
CUDA cores 1024
Floating-point performance 2,355 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 32 nm
Pipelines 1024
Texture fill rate 73.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 65 Watt
Transistor count 5,200 million 1,303 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support 1
G-SYNC support
HDMI
VGA аnalog display support 1

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Interface MXM-B (3.0) IGP
Laptop size large
SLI options 1
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 80 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 2500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI