NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M and AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 944 MHz vs 760 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 844 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 6.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3775 vs 567
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 340 vs 226
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 January 2015 vs 23 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 944 MHz vs 760 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz vs 844 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3775 vs 567 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 vs 226 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M | AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3775 | 567 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | 226 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14739 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.59 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 720.592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.903 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.947 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.296 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5783 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5783 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1831 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M | AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | GM204 | Scrapper |
Launch date | 9 January 2015 | 23 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 703 | 705 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | 844 MHz |
Core clock speed | 944 MHz | 760 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 73.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,303 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | IGP |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI |