NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 73.6 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
Around 70% better floating-point performance: 2,355 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
500x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14739 vs 11325
Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.59 vs 42.463
Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 720.592 vs 642.715
Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.903 vs 2.933
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.947 vs 26.532
Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.296 vs 133.458
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5783 vs 4843
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5783 vs 4843
Around 45% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1831 vs 1265

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	9 January 2015 vs 18 February 2014
Texture fill rate	73.6 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 640
Floating-point performance	2,355 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 60 Watt
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	14739 vs 11325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	67.59 vs 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	720.592 vs 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.903 vs 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	57.947 vs 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	223.296 vs 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5783 vs 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3337 vs 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5783 vs 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3337 vs 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1831 vs 1265

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 944 MHz
Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 950 MHz
Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3904 vs 3775
Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 512 vs 340
Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 2566
Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 2566

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1020 MHz vs 944 MHz
Boost clock speed	1085 MHz vs 950 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3904 vs 3775
PassMark - G2D Mark	512 vs 340
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683 vs 2566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683 vs 2566

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3775

3904

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

340

512

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14739

11325

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

67.59

42.463

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

720.592

642.715

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.903

2.933

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

57.947

26.532

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

223.296

133.458

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5783

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2566

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3337

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5783

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2566

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3337

3329

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1831

1265

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	3775	3904
PassMark - G2D Mark	340	512
Geekbench - OpenCL	14739	11325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	67.59	42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	720.592	642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.903	2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	57.947	26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	223.296	133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5783	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2566	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3337	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5783	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2566	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3337	3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1831	1265

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Maxwell
Code name	GM204	GM107
Launch date	9 January 2015	18 February 2014
Place in performance rating	703	704
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$149
Price now		$299.01
Value for money (0-100)		15.02
Technical info
Boost clock speed	950 MHz	1085 MHz
Core clock speed	944 MHz	1020 MHz
CUDA cores	1024	640
Floating-point performance	2,355 gflops	1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1024	640
Texture fill rate	73.6 GTexel / s	43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	5,200 million	1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	1
G-SYNC support
HDMI
VGA аnalog display support	1
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large
SLI options	1
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		5.7" (14.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s	86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	5.4 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
FXAA
TXAA