NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs AMD Radeon R9 390

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp and AMD Radeon R9 390 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp

  • Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 275 Watt
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 255.521 vs 120.267
  • Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.26 vs 11.097
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1376.357 vs 607.381
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10550 vs 10445
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10550 vs 10445
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1582 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt vs 275 Watt
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 255.521 vs 120.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 21.26 vs 11.097
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1376.357 vs 607.381
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10550 vs 10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10550 vs 10445

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390

  • Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3164.164 vs 2621.94
  • 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.473 vs 34.491
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3164.164 vs 2621.94
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 116.473 vs 34.491
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3708 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3708 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3343

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
255.521
120.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2621.94
3164.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
21.26
11.097
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
34.491
116.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1376.357
607.381
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10550
10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3698
3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3343
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10550
10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3698
3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3343
3353
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp AMD Radeon R9 390
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 255.521 120.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2621.94 3164.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 21.26 11.097
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 34.491 116.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1376.357 607.381
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10550 10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3698 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3343 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10550 10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3698 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3343 3353
PassMark - G3D Mark 8903
PassMark - G2D Mark 793
Geekbench - OpenCL 43905
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3944

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp AMD Radeon R9 390

Essentials

Place in performance rating 305 306
Type Desktop Desktop
Architecture GCN 2.0
Code name Grenada
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch date 18 June 2015
Launch price (MSRP) $329

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1582 MHz 1000 MHz
CUDA cores 3840
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt 275 Watt
Compute units 40
Floating-point performance 5,120 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm
Pipelines 2560
Stream Processors 2560
Texture fill rate 160.0 GTexel / s
Transistor count 6,200 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors DisplayPort, HDMI 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Height 4.4 in
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 10.5 in 275 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 6-pin + 8-pin 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support PCIe 3.0

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan
Mantle
OpenCL 2.0

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 547.7 GB/s 384 GB/s
Memory bus width 384 bit 512 bit
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz

Technologies

GameStream
GPU Boost
SLI
VR Ready
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore