NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp versus AMD Radeon R9 390
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp and AMD Radeon R9 390 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
- Environ 58% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 275 Watt
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 255.521 versus 120.267
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.26 versus 11.097
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1376.357 versus 607.381
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10550 versus 10445
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10550 versus 10445
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 275 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 versus 120.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 versus 11.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 versus 607.381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10550 versus 10445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10550 versus 10445 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 390
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3164.164 versus 2621.94
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.473 versus 34.491
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3164.164 versus 2621.94 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.473 versus 34.491 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3343 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | AMD Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 | 120.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 | 3164.164 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 | 11.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.491 | 116.473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 | 607.381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10550 | 10445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10550 | 10445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3353 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8903 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 793 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43905 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3944 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | AMD Radeon R9 390 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 305 | 306 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | |
| Nom de code | Grenada | |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 3840 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Unités de Compute | 40 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,120 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 160.0 GTexel / s | |
| Compte de transistor | 6,200 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | DisplayPort, HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | 4.4 in | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 10.5 in | 275 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6-pin + 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.7 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 512 bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
ATIFireGL V7600
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
AMDFireStream 9250
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
AMDRadeon R9 290X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
AMDRadeon R9 390
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
