NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 250 MHz
- Around 80% higher texture fill rate: 1.8 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 90 nm vs 150 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 128 MB vs 64 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 33x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 66 vs 2
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2006 vs 31 May 2005 |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 1.8 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 128 MB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 66 vs 2 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 119 vs 112
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 vs 112 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 66 | 2 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 112 | 119 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 240 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 240 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Curie | Celsius |
Code name | G72 | NV18 C1 |
Launch date | 1 February 2006 | 31 May 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 1575 | 1316 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 4 | |
Texture fill rate | 1.8 GTexel / s | 1 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 112 million | 29 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 8.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 3.6 GB / s | 3.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 450 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 400 MHz |
Memory type | 64 / 32 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CineFX 4.0 | ||
Intellisample 4.0 | ||
PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
UltraShadow II |