NVIDIA NVS 315 vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 315 and NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA NVS 315

NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 315

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 16% higher core clock speed: 523 MHz vs 450 MHz
2.3x more texture fill rate: 4.184 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
12x more pipelines: 48 vs 4
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
8x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 128 MB
Around 94% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz vs 900 MHz
4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 320 vs 66
Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 180 vs 112
5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1382 vs 240
5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1382 vs 240

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 March 2013 vs 1 February 2006
Core clock speed	523 MHz vs 450 MHz
Texture fill rate	4.184 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	48 vs 4
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 90 nm
Maximum memory size	1 GB vs 128 MB
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz vs 900 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	320 vs 66
PassMark - G2D Mark	180 vs 112
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1382 vs 240
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1382 vs 240

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 315
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

320

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

180

112

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1382

240

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1382

240

Name	NVIDIA NVS 315	NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400
PassMark - G3D Mark	320	66
PassMark - G2D Mark	180	112
Geekbench - OpenCL	882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	3.025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	79.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	4.705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	6.573
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	465
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	942
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1382	240
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	465
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	942
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1382	240

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA NVS 315	NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Curie
Code name	GF119	G72
Launch date	10 March 2013	1 February 2006
Launch price (MSRP)	$159
Place in performance rating	1577	1575
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	523 MHz	450 MHz
Floating-point performance	100.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	90 nm
Pipelines	48	4
Texture fill rate	4.184 GTexel / s	1.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	19 Watt
Transistor count	292 million	112 million
Boost clock speed		450 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DMS-59	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	145 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	9.0c
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	128 MB
Memory bandwidth	14 GB / s	3.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	450 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	900 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	64 / 32
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CineFX 4.0
Intellisample 4.0
PowerMizer 6.0
UltraShadow II