NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT and NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 4.9x more texture fill rate: 8.8 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 32 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 128 MB
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 137 vs 66
- 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1465 vs 240
- 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1465 vs 240
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 August 2008 vs 1 February 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 32 vs 4 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 137 vs 66 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1465 vs 240 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1465 vs 240 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 112 vs 57
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 112 vs 57 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 137 | 66 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 57 | 112 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1465 | 240 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1465 | 240 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
| Code name | G96 | G72 |
| Launch date | 19 August 2008 | 1 February 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 1573 | 1575 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 450 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 32 | |
| Floating-point performance | 84.8 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 4 |
| Texture fill rate | 8.8 GTexel / s | 1.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 314 million | 112 million |
| Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 1920x1200 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 3.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 450 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | 64 / 32 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||
| CineFX 4.0 | ||
| Intellisample 4.0 | ||
| PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
| UltraShadow II | ||
