NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 VE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 VE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 8.1x more texture fill rate: 13.8 GTexel / s vs 1.7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 90 nm vs 130 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 128 MB
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 264 vs 33
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 283 vs 161
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 October 2006 vs 1 September 2004 |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 13.8 GTexel / s vs 1.7 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 264 vs 33 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 vs 161 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 VE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 VE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 264 | 33 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 | 161 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 951 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 951 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 VE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Curie | Rankine |
Code name | G71 | NV36 A1 |
Launch date | 12 October 2006 | 1 September 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 1053 | 1055 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 575 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | |
Texture fill rate | 13.8 GTexel / s | 1.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Transistor count | 278 million | 82 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-III | AGP 8x |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB / s | 8.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 700 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 400 MHz |
Memory type | 256 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CineFX 4.0 | ||
Intellisample 4.0 | ||
PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
UltraShadow II |