NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 575 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 13.8 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 264 vs 218
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 283 vs 272
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 October 2006 vs 29 September 2005 |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 575 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 13.8 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 264 vs 218 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 vs 272 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1247 vs 951
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1247 vs 951
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1247 vs 951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1247 vs 951 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 264 | 218 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 | 272 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 951 | 1247 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 951 | 1247 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Curie | Curie |
Code name | G71 | G71 |
Launch date | 12 October 2006 | 29 September 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 1051 | 1052 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.77 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 575 MHz | 500 MHz |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 13.8 GTexel / s | 12 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 278 million | 278 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-III | MXM-III |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 700 Bit | 600 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | 256 | 256 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CineFX 4.0 | ||
Intellisample 4.0 | ||
PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
UltraShadow II |