NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs Intel HD Graphics P630
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and Intel HD Graphics P630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX230
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 5.1x more core clock speed: 1519 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1839 vs 1192
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6691 vs 4987
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2680 vs 979
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 2158
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3049
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2680 vs 979
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 2158
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3049
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 vs 5 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1519 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1839 vs 1192 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6691 vs 4987 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2680 vs 979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3049 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2680 vs 979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3049 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P630
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 298 vs 217
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 298 vs 217 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | Intel HD Graphics P630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1839 | 1192 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 298 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6691 | 4987 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.591 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 445.82 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.736 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2680 | 979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3049 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2680 | 979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3049 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | Intel HD Graphics P630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | GP108 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 | 5 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1005 | 1017 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1519 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |