NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX230
- Videocard is newer: launch date 15 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1519 MHz vs 450 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- 5.9x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 59 Watt
- 7.1x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 44.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1830 vs 41
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 vs 170
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 vs 23 October 2003 |
Core clock speed | 1519 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 59 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1830 vs 41 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 vs 170 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1830 | 41 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 | 170 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.591 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 445.82 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.736 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2680 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2680 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Rankine |
Code name | GP108 | NV35 |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 | 23 October 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1014 | 1011 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1519 MHz | 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 59 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 135 million |
Texture fill rate | 1.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x Molex |
Length | 218 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 850 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 27.2 GB / s |