NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX230

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 5.1x more core clock speed: 1519 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
• Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1830 vs 1042
• Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6740 vs 4592
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 445.82 vs 273.504
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.43 vs 19.939
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 102.234 vs 31.881
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2680 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2227
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2680 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2227

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 214
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 21.591
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 1.736

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1830 1042
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	214 241
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6740 4592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.591 27.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	445.82 273.504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.736 1.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.43 19.939
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	102.234 31.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2680 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3705 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2680 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3705 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 2227

Compare specifications (specs)