NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX230

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1519 MHz vs 1354 MHz
• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1493 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.43 vs 30.523

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4463 vs 1830
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 292 vs 214
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 vs 6740
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 21.591
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 799.414 vs 445.82
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 1.736
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 102.234
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 vs 2680
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 vs 2680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1830 4463
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	214 292
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6740 17466
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.591 67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	445.82 799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.736 4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.43 30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	102.234 223.683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2680 7239
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3705 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2680 7239
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3705 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3359

Compare specifications (specs)