NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 38% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 680 MHz
• 3.2x more pipelines: 384 vs 120
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
• 4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• 12.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2407 vs 192
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1503
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1503

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT

• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 329 vs 240

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2407 192
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	240 329
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 1503
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 1503

Compare specifications (specs)