NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon Vega 11

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and AMD Radeon Vega 11 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce MX250

AMD Radeon Vega 11

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
3.1x more core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 300 MHz
3.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 35 Watt
Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2407 vs 1838
Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 vs 41.582
Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 535.24 vs 371.843
Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 vs 2156
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2475
Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 vs 2156
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2475

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	21 February 2019 vs 13 February 2018
Core clock speed	937 MHz vs 300 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2407 vs 1838
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	46.992 vs 41.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	535.24 vs 371.843
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4027 vs 2156
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3710 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 vs 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4027 vs 2156
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3710 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 vs 3343

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 11

Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1038 MHz
Around 83% higher pipelines: 704 vs 384
2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 485 vs 240
Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13288 vs 9265
Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.156 vs 2.64
Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.449 vs 44.7
Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 248.838 vs 141.816

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz vs 1038 MHz
Pipelines	704 vs 384
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	485 vs 240
Geekbench - OpenCL	13288 vs 9265
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.156 vs 2.64
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	52.449 vs 44.7
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	248.838 vs 141.816

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 11

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2407

1838

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

240

485

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9265

13288

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

46.992

41.582

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

535.24

371.843

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.64

3.156

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

44.7

52.449

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

141.816

248.838

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4027

2156

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3710

2475

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3343

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4027

2156

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3710

2475

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3343

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	AMD Radeon Vega 11
PassMark - G3D Mark	2407	1838
PassMark - G2D Mark	240	485
Geekbench - OpenCL	9265	13288
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	46.992	41.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	535.24	371.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.64	3.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	44.7	52.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	141.816	248.838
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4027	2156
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3710	2475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357	3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4027	2156
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3710	2475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357	3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	888	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	AMD Radeon Vega 11
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 5.0
Code name	GP108B	Owl
Launch date	21 February 2019	13 February 2018
Place in performance rating	902	903
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1038 MHz	1300 MHz
Core clock speed	937 MHz	300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	384	704
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt	35 Watt
Transistor count	1,800 million	4,940 million
Floating-point performance		1,830 gflops
Texture fill rate		57.2 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.0
OpenGL	4.6
Memory
Memory bus width	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared