NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon HD 6990
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and AMD Radeon HD 6990 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 830 MHz
- 168x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 18.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 375 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4655 vs 4562
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4655 vs 4562
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 8 March 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 830 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s vs 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 375 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 vs 4562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 vs 4562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6990
- 4.8x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 640
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3014 vs 2809
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 236
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 640 |
| Maximum memory size | 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3014 vs 2809 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 vs 236 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6990
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | AMD Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2809 | 3014 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 | 532 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13522 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | 4562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | 4562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.264 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 840.452 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.76 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.903 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 265.302 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | AMD Radeon HD 6990 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 3 |
| Code name | GP107 | Antilles |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 8 March 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 668 | 665 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Price now | $159.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.81 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 830 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 2x 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3300 million | 2,640 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,549.8 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 295 mm | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2x 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 2x 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 2x 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX350 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5900
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIFireMV 2200
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6990
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
