NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 999 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 1328 MHz
- 884.4x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 53.12 GTexel / s
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13522 vs 12601
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1491
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1341
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1491
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1341
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 3 January 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 999 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz vs 1328 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s vs 53.12 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13522 vs 12601 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 1491 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 1491 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1341 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4049 vs 2809
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 vs 236
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6614 vs 4655
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6614 vs 4655
- Around 66% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2076 vs 1247
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4049 vs 2809 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 287 vs 236 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6614 vs 4655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6614 vs 4655 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2076 vs 1247 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2809 | 4049 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 | 287 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13522 | 12601 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | 6614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 1491 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 1341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | 6614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 1491 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 1341 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 | 2076 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP107 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 3 January 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 668 | 669 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 1328 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 999 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | 53.12 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3300 million | 3,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,700 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 112.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 7008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX350 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5900
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIFireMV 2200
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6990
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
