NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 786.7x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 59.72 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 75 Watt
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 1 February 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s vs 59.72 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1468 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4463 vs 2807
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 292 vs 235
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 vs 13562
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 vs 4655
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 vs 4655
- Around 67% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2084 vs 1247
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1468 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4463 vs 2807 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 292 vs 235 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 vs 13562 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 vs 4655 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 vs 4655 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2084 vs 1247 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 | 4463 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 | 292 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13562 | 17466 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | 7239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | 7239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 | 2084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP107 | GP106B |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 1 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 654 | 595 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 1493 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | 59.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3300 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,911 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 112.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection |