NVIDIA GeForce MX550 vs Intel UHD Graphics P750
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and Intel UHD Graphics P750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX550
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1065 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1320 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 1024 vs 256
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4610 vs 1728
- 5.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35034 vs 6619
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1065 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1320 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 256 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4610 vs 1728 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35034 vs 6619 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics P750
- Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 57.60 GTexel/s vs 42.24 GTexel/s
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 452 vs 404
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 57.60 GTexel/s vs 42.24 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 452 vs 404 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX550
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics P750
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX550 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 | 452 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4610 | 1728 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35034 | 6619 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.448 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1017.021 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.996 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.46 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 587.99 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX550 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Generation 12.1 |
Code name | TU117 | Rocket Lake GT1 |
Launch date | 2022 | 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 452 | 445 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1320 MHz | 900 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1065 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 42.24 GFLOPS (1:64) | 115.2 GFLOPS (1:4) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.703 TFLOPS (1:1) | 921.6 GFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.703 TFLOPS | 460.8 GFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1024 | 256 |
Pixel fill rate | 21.12 GPixel/s | 28.80 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 42.24 GTexel/s | 57.60 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 |