NVIDIA GeForce MX550 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and NVIDIA Quadro M5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce MX550

NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX550

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1065 MHz vs 975 MHz
Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1320 MHz vs 1051 MHz
451.3x more texture fill rate: 42.24 GTexel/s vs 93.6 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 100 Watt
Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35019 vs 22163
Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 102.448 vs 95.613
Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 87.46 vs 83.683
Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 587.99 vs 366.321

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2022 vs 18 August 2015
Core clock speed	1065 MHz vs 975 MHz
Boost clock speed	1320 MHz vs 1051 MHz
Texture fill rate	42.24 GTexel/s vs 93.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	35019 vs 22163
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	102.448 vs 95.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	87.46 vs 83.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	587.99 vs 366.321

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Around 50% higher pipelines: 1,536 vs 1024
4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
3.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 478 vs 404
Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6939 vs 4610
Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1341.18 vs 1017.021
Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.869 vs 4.996

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1,536 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	478 vs 404
PassMark - G3D Mark	6939 vs 4610
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1341.18 vs 1017.021
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.869 vs 4.996

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX550
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

404

478

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4610

6939

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

35019

22163

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

102.448

95.613

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1017.021

1341.18

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.996

6.869

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

87.46

83.683

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

587.99

366.321

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX550	NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
PassMark - G2D Mark	404	478
PassMark - G3D Mark	4610	6939
Geekbench - OpenCL	35019	22163
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	102.448	95.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1017.021	1341.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.996	6.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	87.46	83.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	587.99	366.321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3339
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX550	NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	TU117	GM204
Launch date	2022	18 August 2015
Place in performance rating	451	449
Type		Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1320 MHz	1051 MHz
Core clock speed	1065 MHz	975 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	42.24 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	2.703 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.703 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	1,536
Pixel fill rate	21.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	42.24 GTexel/s	93.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	5,200 million
Floating-point performance		2,995 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	IGP
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.7 (6.4)	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	96.00 GB/s	160 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus