NVIDIA GeForce MX550 vs AMD Radeon R7 A265
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and AMD Radeon R7 A265 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1065 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1320 MHz vs 825 MHz
- 2133.3x more texture fill rate: 42.24 GTexel/s vs 19.8 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4610 vs 994
- 5.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35021 vs 6925
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2022 vs 9 January 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1065 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1320 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 42.24 GTexel/s vs 19.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4610 vs 994 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35021 vs 6925 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 A265
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 468 vs 404
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 468 vs 404 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX550
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 A265
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX550 | AMD Radeon R7 A265 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 | 468 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4610 | 994 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35021 | 6925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.448 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1017.021 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.996 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.46 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 587.99 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX550 | AMD Radeon R7 A265 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Opal |
Launch date | 2022 | 9 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 451 | 455 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1320 MHz | 825 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1065 MHz | 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 42.24 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.703 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.703 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 21.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 42.24 GTexel/s | 19.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 |