NVIDIA GeForce MX550 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 19 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 94% higher core clock speed: 1065 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 19200x more texture fill rate: 42.24 GTexel/s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 90 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- Around 85% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 810 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 396 vs 378
- 52.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4527 vs 86
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2022 vs 20 April 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 1065 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 42.24 GTexel/s vs 2.2 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 810 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 396 vs 378 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4527 vs 86 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 21 Watt vs 25 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 21 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX550
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX550 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 350 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 396 | 378 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4527 | 86 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34265 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.448 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1017.021 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.996 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.46 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 587.99 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX550 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 350 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Curie |
| Code name | TU117 | G72 |
| Launch date | 2022 | 20 April 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 452 | 453 |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1320 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1065 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 90 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 42.24 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.703 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.703 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 21.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 42.24 GTexel/s | 2.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 21 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 112 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 9.0c |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 6.48 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 810 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR2 |

