NVIDIA GeForce MX550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX550

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1065 MHz vs 863 MHz
• Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1320 MHz vs 900 MHz
• 263.2x more texture fill rate: 42.24 GTexel/s vs 160.5 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 10x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34283 vs 23223
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 102.448 vs 57.735
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 87.46 vs 37.407
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 587.99 vs 174.323

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

• 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• 4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
• Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 589 vs 396
• Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7993 vs 4491
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1269.688 vs 1017.021
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.505 vs 4.996

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	396 589
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4491 7993
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	34283 23223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	102.448 57.735
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1017.021 1269.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.996 5.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	87.46 37.407
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	587.99 174.323

Compare specifications (specs)