NVIDIA GeForce MX550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1065 MHz vs 863 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1320 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 263.2x more texture fill rate: 42.24 GTexel/s vs 160.5 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34265 vs 23233
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 102.448 vs 57.735
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 87.46 vs 37.407
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 587.99 vs 174.323
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2022 vs 23 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1065 MHz vs 863 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1320 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 42.24 GTexel/s vs 160.5 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34265 vs 23233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.448 vs 57.735 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.46 vs 37.407 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 587.99 vs 174.323 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 396
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7986 vs 4527
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1269.688 vs 1017.021
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.505 vs 4.996
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1024 |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 vs 396 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7986 vs 4527 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 vs 1017.021 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.505 vs 4.996 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 396 | 590 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4527 | 7986 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34265 | 23233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.448 | 57.735 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1017.021 | 1269.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.996 | 5.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.46 | 37.407 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 587.99 | 174.323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2777 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Code name | TU117 | GK110 |
| Launch date | 2022 | 23 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 452 | 451 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Price now | $740.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1320 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1065 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 42.24 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.703 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.703 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 21.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 42.24 GTexel/s | 160.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 7,080 million |
| CUDA cores | 2304 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX550 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX550 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 350
NVIDIAGeForce MX550 vs
ATIRadeon X1650 GTO
NVIDIAGeForce MX550 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780
NVIDIAGeForce MX550 vs
AMDFirePro W7100
NVIDIAGeForce MX550 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5000M
NVIDIAGeForce MX550 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q
