NVIDIA GeForce MX570A vs AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX570A and AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX570A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 962.5x more texture fill rate: 73.92 GTexel/s vs 76.8 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
Launch date | May 2022 vs 17 January 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s vs 76.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 832 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1155 MHz
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65257 vs 39465
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 832 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1155 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65257 vs 39465 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX570A
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX570A | AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6019 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39465 | 65257 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX570A | AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GA107 | Baffin |
Launch date | May 2022 | 17 January 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 315 | 313 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 832 MHz | 1090 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 73.92 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | 76.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2,458 gflops | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 170 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 112.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |