NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 59513 vs 39431
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15485 vs 13107
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15485 vs 13107
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 January 2019 vs 5 March 2016 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 59513 vs 39431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15485 vs 13107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15485 vs 13107 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 1920
- 4x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11869 vs 9791
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 695 vs 417
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 1920 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11869 vs 9791 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 695 vs 417 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9791 | 11869 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 417 | 695 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 59513 | 39431 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 234.866 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2849.031 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.956 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 147.291 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 809.639 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15485 | 13107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15485 | 13107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3354 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5596 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | TU106 | GM200 |
| Launch date | 6 January 2019 | 5 March 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 248 | 233 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,999 | |
Technical info |
||
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 3072 |
| Boost clock speed | 1114 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 988 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 285.2 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 8,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | large | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 317.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs
ATIFirePro RG220
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 390 X2
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIATesla M40
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIATesla P100 SXM2
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7130
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIATesla K80
