NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1470 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2176 vs 1920
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16574 vs 14150
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 859 vs 750
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 87113 vs 70649
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 246.191 vs 220.337
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3885.018 vs 3131.344
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.053 vs 21.852
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 165.463 vs 135.923
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1271.757 vs 1141.283
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20969 vs 20094
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20969 vs 20094
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 vs 7 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Pipelines | 2176 vs 1920 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16574 vs 14150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 859 vs 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87113 vs 70649 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 246.191 vs 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 vs 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 vs 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 vs 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 vs 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 vs 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 vs 20094 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 175 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 5567
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 5026
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 5567
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 5026
- 3744.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7489 vs 2
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 5026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 5026 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7489 vs 2 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16574 | 14150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 859 | 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87113 | 70649 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 246.191 | 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 | 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 | 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 | 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 7489 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU106 | TU106 |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 | 7 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 145 | 150 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz | 1365 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2176 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 2176 | 1920 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 10.8 B | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
Length | 9.0” (228.60mm) | 229 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8 pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |