NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1470 MHz versus 1365 MHz
- Environ 13% de pipelines plus haut: 2176 versus 1920
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16576 versus 14148
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 859 versus 750
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 87091 versus 70661
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 246.191 versus 220.337
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3885.018 versus 3131.344
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.053 versus 21.852
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 165.463 versus 135.923
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1271.757 versus 1141.283
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20969 versus 20094
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20969 versus 20094
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 7 January 2019 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1470 MHz versus 1365 MHz |
Pipelines | 2176 versus 1920 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16576 versus 14148 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 859 versus 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87091 versus 70661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 246.191 versus 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 versus 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 versus 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 versus 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 versus 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 versus 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 versus 20094 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1680 MHz versus 1650 MHz
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 175 Watt
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 5567
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 5026
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 5567
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 5026
- 3744x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7488 versus 2
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz versus 1650 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 175 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 5026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 5026 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7488 versus 2 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16576 | 14148 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 859 | 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87091 | 70661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 246.191 | 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 | 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 | 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 | 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 7488 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU106 | TU106 |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 7 January 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $349 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 145 | 150 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1470 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 2176 | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 2176 | 1920 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 160 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.8 B | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
Longeur | 9.0” (228.60mm) | 229 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8 pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |