NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and NVIDIA Quadro K620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1470 MHz vs 1058 MHz
• Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1124 MHz
• 5.7x more pipelines: 2176 vs 384
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
• 7.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 7.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16476 vs 2220
• Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 856 vs 480
• 12.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 87635 vs 6869
• 10.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 241.214 vs 22.112
• 13x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3870.683 vs 297.631
• 18.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.021 vs 1.427
• 10.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.92 vs 15.363
• 12.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1269.445 vs 99.125
• 7.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20969 vs 2970
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5567 vs 2490
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5026 vs 3329
• 7.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20969 vs 2970
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5567 vs 2490
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5026 vs 3329

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620

• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 175 Watt
• 351x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 702 vs 2

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	16476 2220
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	856 480
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	87635 6869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	241.214 22.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3870.683 297.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.021 1.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	160.92 15.363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1269.445 99.125
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20969 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5567 2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5026 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20969 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5567 2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5026 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2 702

Compare specifications (specs)