NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super versus NVIDIA Quadro K620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and NVIDIA Quadro K620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 39% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1470 MHz versus 1058 MHz
- Environ 47% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1650 MHz versus 1124 MHz
- 5.7x plus de pipelines: 2176 versus 384
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- 7.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 7.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16476 versus 2220
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 856 versus 480
- 12.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 87635 versus 6869
- 10.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 241.214 versus 22.112
- 13x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3870.683 versus 297.631
- 18.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.021 versus 1.427
- 10.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.92 versus 15.363
- 12.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1269.445 versus 99.125
- 7.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20969 versus 2970
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5567 versus 2490
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5026 versus 3329
- 7.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20969 versus 2970
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5567 versus 2490
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5026 versus 3329
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 22 July 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1470 MHz versus 1058 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz versus 1124 MHz |
Pipelines | 2176 versus 384 |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16476 versus 2220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 856 versus 480 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87635 versus 6869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 241.214 versus 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3870.683 versus 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.021 versus 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.92 versus 15.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1269.445 versus 99.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 versus 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 versus 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 versus 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 versus 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 versus 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 versus 3329 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K620
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 41 Watt versus 175 Watt
- 351x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 702 versus 2
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt versus 175 Watt |
Référence | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 versus 2 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA Quadro K620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16476 | 2220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 856 | 480 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87635 | 6869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 241.214 | 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3870.683 | 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.021 | 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.92 | 15.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1269.445 | 99.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 702 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
Nom de code | TU106 | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 22 July 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $189.89 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 148 | 953 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix maintenant | $189.93 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1470 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 2176 | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 2176 | 384 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 41 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.8 B | 1,870 million |
Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | 4 |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
Longeur | 9.0” (228.60mm) | 160 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8 pin | None |
Largeur | 2-Slot | 1" (2.5 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | 128 Bit |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |