NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 19571
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3717
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3357
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 19571
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3717
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1365 MHz
• Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1680 MHz
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 14148
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 750
• Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 vs 70661
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 220.337
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 3131.344
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 21.852
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 vs 135.923
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 1141.283
• Around 86% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 vs 7488

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	14148 18872
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	750 791
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	70661 74179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	220.337 488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3131.344 5451.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.852 41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.923 153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1141.283 1534.582
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20094 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7442 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6714 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20094 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7442 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6714 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	7488 13943

Compare specifications (specs)