NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA TITAN V videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 8.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- 6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.975 vs 20.669
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 15401
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3716
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 4193
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 15401
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3716
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 4193
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2019 vs 7 December 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 vs 20.669 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 4193 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V
- 2.7x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1920
- 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19615 vs 14122
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 899 vs 747
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 155351 vs 71650
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.561 vs 217.04
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3583.136 vs 3119.736
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 vs 21.707
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 vs 1141.283
- 2.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3577 vs 1243
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 1920 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19615 vs 14122 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 899 vs 747 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 155351 vs 71650 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 vs 217.04 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3583.136 vs 3119.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 vs 21.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 vs 1141.283 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3577 vs 1243 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA TITAN V |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14122 | 19615 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 | 899 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71650 | 155351 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 | 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 | 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 | 30.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 | 20.669 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | 1504.373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 4193 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1243 | 3577 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Code name | TU106 | GV100 |
Launch date | 7 January 2019 | 7 December 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | $2,999 |
Place in performance rating | 162 | 158 |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 1920 | 5120 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,899 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 465.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 3072 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Memory bandwidth | 652.8 GB / s |