AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1905 MHz vs 1680 MHz
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16535 vs 14146
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 922 vs 747
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 77231 vs 71612
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 vs 217.04
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3949.565 vs 3119.736
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.769 vs 21.707
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 133.975
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 vs 1141.283
- Around 27% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9470 vs 7482
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 7 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz vs 1680 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16535 vs 14146 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 vs 747 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77231 vs 71612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 vs 217.04 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 vs 3119.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 vs 21.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 133.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 vs 1141.283 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9470 vs 7482 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Around 41% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 14699
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3720
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3369
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 14699
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3720
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3369
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 3369 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16535 | 14146 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 | 747 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77231 | 71612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 217.04 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 3119.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 21.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 133.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9470 | 7482 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | TU106 |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 7 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $400 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 160 | 159 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture fill rate | 304.8 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 10.3 B | 10,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | |
Pipelines | 1920 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 8-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |