NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1920
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 160 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 7442
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 7442
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8029 vs 6714
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8029 vs 6714
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1920 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 vs 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 vs 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 vs 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 vs 6714 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 vs 601
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14149 vs 12354
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 18604
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 18604
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7489 vs 7453 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 vs 601 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14149 vs 12354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 18604 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7453 | 7489 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 | 750 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 | 14149 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 | 6714 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70662 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.337 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.852 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.923 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU106 | TU106 |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 7 January 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 128 | 150 |
Price now | $489.99 | $349.99 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | 62.74 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1920 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB |