NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1745 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- 2.2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25496 vs 18604
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25496 vs 18604
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15353 vs 12354
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1745 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 2304 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25496 vs 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25496 vs 18604 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15353 vs 12354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 3716
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 3716
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8029 vs 3357
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8029 vs 3357
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 601 vs 584
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 vs 3357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 vs 584 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25496 | 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25496 | 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 8898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 8898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 8029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 8029 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 | 601 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15353 | 12354 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98361 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7409 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU106 |
Place in performance rating | 134 | 137 |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | |
Price now | $489.99 | |
Type | Laptop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1745 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 558.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.87 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 17.87 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5120 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 139.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 279.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |