NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 535.3x more texture fill rate: 172.8 GTexel/s vs 322.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 235 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20002 vs 16640
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20002 vs 16640
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 1 October 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s vs 322.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 W vs 235 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20002 vs 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20002 vs 16640 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GP100
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1304 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1442 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 1430 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16374 vs 13925
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 631
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 84757 vs 68337
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 vs 10384
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 vs 10130
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 vs 10384
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 vs 10130
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1304 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1442 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2560 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1430 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16374 vs 13925 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 vs 631 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 84757 vs 68337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13211 vs 10384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 22133 vs 10130 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13211 vs 10384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 22133 vs 10130 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13925 | 16374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 631 | 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68337 | 84757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20002 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 10384 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10130 | 22133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20002 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 10384 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10130 | 22133 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7353 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 355.937 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4858.771 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.191 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 144.928 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1056.078 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU104B | GP100 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 1 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 114 | 87 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1442 MHz |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1304 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 69.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s | 322.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 W | 235 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 15,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 10,329 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | 921.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) | 1430 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |