NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 8.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1430 MHz
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 297.996 vs 205.417
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.75 vs 19.996
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1116.69 vs 940.599
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 20 June 2016 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1430 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 vs 205.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 vs 19.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 vs 940.599 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
- Around 62% higher core clock speed: 1190 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 1095 MHz
- Around 22% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2944
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 206586 vs 81953
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4198.719 vs 3676.805
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 218.069 vs 162.692
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1190 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1329 MHz vs 1095 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 2944 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 206586 vs 81953 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4198.719 vs 3676.805 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 218.069 vs 162.692 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13147 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 536 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 81953 | 206586 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | 205.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | 4198.719 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | 19.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | 218.069 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 | 940.599 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7990 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU104B | GP100 |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 20 June 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 143 | 124 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,599 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1095 MHz | 1329 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1190 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 2944 | 3584 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13,600 million | 15,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 10,609 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 331.5 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1430 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 720.9 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6400
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A4500 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M XT
