NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher pipelines: 2944 vs 2304
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 175 Watt
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 297.996 vs 251.703
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.692 vs 153.341
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 vs 3718
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 vs 3350
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 vs 3718
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 vs 3350
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 17 October 2018 |
Pipelines | 2944 vs 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 vs 251.703 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 vs 153.341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Around 92% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1095 MHz
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16147 vs 13064
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 820 vs 527
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 87875 vs 83908
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3742.063 vs 3676.805
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.153 vs 22.75
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1304.365 vs 1116.69
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 vs 19139
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 vs 19139
- Around 13% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8850 vs 7823
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1095 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16147 vs 13064 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 820 vs 527 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87875 vs 83908 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 vs 3676.805 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 vs 22.75 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 vs 1116.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 vs 19139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 vs 19139 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8850 vs 7823 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13064 | 16147 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 | 820 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83908 | 87875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | 251.703 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | 3742.063 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | 27.153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | 153.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 | 1304.365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 | 22615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 | 22615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7823 | 8850 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104B | TU106 |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 17 October 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 148 | 145 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Price now | $499.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1095 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2944 | 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 175 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |