NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1470 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1095 MHz
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16529 vs 13084
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 855 vs 529
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 87370 vs 83908
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3885.018 vs 3676.805
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.053 vs 22.75
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 165.463 vs 162.692
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1271.757 vs 1116.69
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20969 vs 19139
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20969 vs 19139
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 vs 29 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1095 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16529 vs 13084 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 855 vs 529 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87370 vs 83908 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 vs 3676.805 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 vs 22.75 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 vs 162.692 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 vs 1116.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 vs 19139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 vs 19139 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Around 35% higher pipelines: 2944 vs 2176
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 175 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 297.996 vs 246.191
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 vs 5567
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 vs 5026
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 vs 5567
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 vs 5026
- 3911.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7823 vs 2
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2944 vs 2176 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 vs 246.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 vs 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 vs 5026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 vs 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 vs 5026 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7823 vs 2 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16529 | 13084 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 855 | 529 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87370 | 83908 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 246.191 | 297.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 | 3676.805 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 | 22.75 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 | 162.692 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 | 1116.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | 19139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | 8905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | 8060 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | 19139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | 8905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | 8060 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 7823 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU106 | TU104B |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Place in performance rating | 151 | 148 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1095 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz | 735 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2176 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 2176 | 2944 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 10.8 B | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
Length | 9.0” (228.60mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8 pin | |
Width | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |