NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • 585.2x more texture fill rate: 207.4 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
  • 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 87094 vs 60899
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20718 vs 15019
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20718 vs 15019
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 vs 10 March 2017
Texture fill rate 207.4 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 87094 vs 60899
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20718 vs 15019
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20718 vs 15019

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

  • 2x more core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 735 MHz
  • Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1080 MHz
  • Around 17% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 3072
  • Around 38% higher maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 8 GB
  • 8x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17659 vs 13984
  • Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 vs 609
  • Around 16% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9943 vs 8573
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1481 MHz vs 735 MHz
Boost clock speed 1582 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Pipelines 3584 vs 3072
Maximum memory size 11 GB vs 8 GB
Memory clock speed 11008 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 17659 vs 13984
PassMark - G2D Mark 927 vs 609
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 9943 vs 8573

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
13984
17659
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
609
927
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
87094
60899
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20718
15019
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20718
15019
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
8573
9943
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark 13984 17659
PassMark - G2D Mark 609 927
Geekbench - OpenCL 87094 60899
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20718 15019
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3713 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20718 15019
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3713 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 8573 9943
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 204.978
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2410.106
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 19.591
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 25.543
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1383.644

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name TU104B GP102
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 10 March 2017
Place in performance rating 58 56
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $699
Price now $826.98
Value for money (0-100) 27.48

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1080 MHz 1582 MHz
Core clock speed 735 MHz 1481 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 207.4 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 13.27 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 6.636 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3072 3584
Pixel fill rate 69.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 207.4 GTexel/s 354.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 11,800 million
Floating-point performance 11,340 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 91 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width Dual-slot
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 600 Watt

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 11 GB
Memory bandwidth 352.0 GB/s 484.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 352 Bit
Memory clock speed 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) 11008 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5X
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
GPU Boost
HDMI 2.0b
PCIe 3.0
SLI
Virtual Reality