NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 585.2x more texture fill rate: 207.4 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82601 vs 62308
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20344 vs 15019
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3716
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20344 vs 15019
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3716
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 10 March 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 207.4 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82601 vs 62308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 vs 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 vs 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3716 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- 2x more core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 3072
- Around 38% higher maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 8 GB
- 8x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18558 vs 13789
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 583
- Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9873 vs 8562
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 3072 |
| Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18558 vs 13789 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 vs 583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9873 vs 8562 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13789 | 18558 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 583 | 937 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82601 | 62308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8562 | 9873 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU104B | GP102 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 10 March 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 136 | 200 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Price now | $826.98 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1481 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 207.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.27 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 69.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 207.4 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 11 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 352 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) | 11008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
IntelArc A770M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
IntelArc Pro A60
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6300
