NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 207.4 GTexel/s vs 172.8 GTexel/s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82601 vs 68337
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20344 vs 20002
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20344 vs 20002
- Around 17% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8579 vs 7353
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 207.4 GTexel/s vs 172.8 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82601 vs 68337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 vs 20002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 vs 20002 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8579 vs 7353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13930 vs 13796
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 632 vs 582
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 10384 vs 8912
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10130 vs 3355
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 10384 vs 8912
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10130 vs 3355
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13930 vs 13796 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 632 vs 582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 10384 vs 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10130 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 10384 vs 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10130 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13796 | 13930 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 582 | 632 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82601 | 68337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 | 20002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 10384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 10130 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 | 20002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 10384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 10130 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8579 | 7353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104B | TU104B |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 2 Apr 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 136 | 116 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1080 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 207.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.27 TFLOPS (2:1) | 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS | 5.530 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 69.12 GPixel/s | 69.12 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 207.4 GTexel/s | 172.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 80 W |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | 352.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
IntelArc A770M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
IntelArc Pro A60
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6300
