NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1481 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1740 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- 353.6x more texture fill rate: 125.3 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 90 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 942 vs 937
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2022 vs 10 March 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1481 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 vs 937 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2304
- 2.8x more maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 4 GB
- 6.3x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18598 vs 12873
- Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67670 vs 49885
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18598 vs 12873 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67670 vs 49885 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 | 937 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 | 18598 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 | 67670 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2231 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA107 | GP102 |
Launch date | 2022 | 10 March 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 88 | 219 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 125.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 250 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 11 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 352 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 11008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |