NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1304 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1740 MHz vs 1442 MHz
- 388.2x more texture fill rate: 125.3 GTexel/s vs 322.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 90 Watt vs 235 Watt
- Around 22% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1430 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 942 vs 836
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2022 vs 1 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1304 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz vs 1442 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s vs 322.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt vs 235 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1430 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 vs 836 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GP100
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2304
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15149 vs 12873
- Around 78% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88910 vs 49885
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15149 vs 12873 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88910 vs 49885 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 | 836 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 | 15149 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 | 88910 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 355.937 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4858.771 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.191 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 144.928 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1056.078 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16640 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13211 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 22133 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16640 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13211 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 22133 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA107 | GP100 |
Launch date | 2022 | 1 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 88 | 86 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz | 1442 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1304 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 125.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s | 322.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 235 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 10,329 gflops | |
Transistor count | 15,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 921.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1430 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |