NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 6 month(s) later
5452.8x more texture fill rate: 171.0 GTexel/s vs 31.36 GTexel / s
10x more pipelines: 3840 vs 384
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
6.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20611 vs 3093
6.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20611 vs 3093
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7929 vs 3344
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7929 vs 3344
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8917 vs 3504
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8917 vs 3504

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 Jan 2021 vs 25 June 2013
Texture fill rate	171.0 GTexel/s vs 31.36 GTexel / s
Pipelines	3840 vs 384
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	20611 vs 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	20611 vs 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	7929 vs 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	7929 vs 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8917 vs 3504
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8917 vs 3504

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

Around 9% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 900 MHz
Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 80 Watt
3.1x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective

Core clock speed	980 MHz vs 900 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 80 Watt
Memory clock speed	5400 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20611

3093

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20611

3093

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7929

3344

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7929

3344

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8917

3504

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8917

3504

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	20611	3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	20611	3093
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	7929	3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	7929	3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8917	3504
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8917	3504
PassMark - G3D Mark		1713
PassMark - G2D Mark		333
Geekbench - OpenCL		4928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		12.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		455.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		24.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		28.025
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2148

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	Kepler
Code name	GA106	GK107
Launch date	12 Jan 2021	25 June 2013
Place in performance rating	117	934
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1425 MHz
Core clock speed	900 MHz	980 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	171.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	10.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	10.94 TFLOPS
Pipelines	3840	384
Pixel fill rate	68.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	171.0 GTexel/s	31.36 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count	12000 million	1,270 million
Floating-point performance		752.6 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	PCIe 4.0 x16
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 API
OpenCL	3.0	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	336.0 GB/s	86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective	5400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Standard memory configuration		GDDR5
Technologies
GPU Boost
VR Ready
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus