NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20611 vs 13044
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20611 vs 13044
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8917 vs 7164
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8917 vs 7164
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 13 August 2018 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20611 vs 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20611 vs 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8917 vs 7164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8917 vs 7164 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 7929
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 7929
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 7929 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 7929 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20611 | 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20611 | 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7929 | 30936 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7929 | 30936 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8917 | 7164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8917 | 7164 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13225 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 783 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69537 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | GA106 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 13 August 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 121 | 122 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $999 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 171.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.94 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.94 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 68.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 171.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12000 million | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A5000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs
AppleM2 Ultra 60-core
