NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20611 vs 20002
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20611 vs 20002
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 2 Apr 2020 |
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20611 vs 20002 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20611 vs 20002 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 172.8 GTexel/s vs 171.0 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10130 vs 7929
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10130 vs 7929
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 10384 vs 8917
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 10384 vs 8917
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s vs 171.0 GTexel/s |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10130 vs 7929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10130 vs 7929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 10384 vs 8917 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 10384 vs 8917 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20611 | 20002 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20611 | 20002 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7929 | 10130 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7929 | 10130 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8917 | 10384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8917 | 10384 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13729 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 618 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76826 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA106 | TU104B |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 2 Apr 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 122 | 120 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1080 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 930 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 171.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.94 TFLOPS (1:1) | 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.94 TFLOPS | 5.530 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 68.40 GPixel/s | 69.12 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 171.0 GTexel/s | 172.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 80 W |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 352.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |