NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1680 MHz
- 3.2x more pipelines: 6144 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 23671 vs 14149
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 vs 750
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138729 vs 70662
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 342.287 vs 220.337
- Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 42.369 vs 21.852
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 146.214 vs 135.923
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1807.647 vs 1141.283
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31420 vs 20094
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8897 vs 7442
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8004 vs 6714
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31420 vs 20094
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8897 vs 7442
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8004 vs 6714
- 2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14958 vs 7489
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2021 vs 7 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1680 MHz |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 1920 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23671 vs 14149 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 vs 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138729 vs 70662 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 vs 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 vs 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 vs 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 vs 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 vs 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 vs 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 vs 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 vs 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 vs 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 vs 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14958 vs 7489 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Around 81% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 290 Watt
- 11.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 290 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23671 | 14149 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 | 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138729 | 70662 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 | 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 | 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 | 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14958 | 7489 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU106 |
Launch date | 31 May 2021 | 7 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 56 | 150 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 339.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 290 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 229 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 608.3 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |